AI-Generated Images πŸ€–

Designing a scalable system for AI-assisted creative production

(View on desktop for best experience)

Company

Roku

Team

Designer (My role)
UI Engineers
Backend Engineers
Project Manager
Product Manager
Merchandising
Copywriter

Users

Merchandising

Timeline

June 2024 - March 2025

Overview

AI Generated Images is an internal platform that enables teams to create, review, and ship AI-assisted visuals at scale.  It lives within a broader creative ecosystem that includes merchandising teams, designers, and emerging AI infrastructure.

I helped design the system that turned experimental AI image generation into a structured, trusted workflow that balanced creative flexibility with quality, governance, and operational confidence.

Rather than functioning as a standalone feature, this product operates as creative infrastructure, supporting how images are generated, refined, reviewed, and approved before reaching production surfaces.

Problem Space

As interest in AI-generated visuals grew, teams began experimenting across different tools and workflows. Without a shared system, this led to several challenges:

  • No standardized process for generating or refining AI images

  • Inconsistent quality and unclear ownership

  • Concerns around brand safety, accuracy, and trust

  • Manual handoffs between tools and teams

  • Limited visibility into iteration history and decisions

Without a system, AI experimentation was fragmented and risky, making it difficult to scale responsibly.

Design Goal

The goal was to create a system that allowed teams to explore AI-assisted creativity while maintaining confidence in what shipped. This meant designing a workflow that:

  • Encouraged experimentation

  • Made quality and approval expectations explicit

  • Scaled across teams and use cases

  • Fit naturally into existing creative processes

The challenge was not how to generate images, but how to operationalize AI in a way teams could trust.

Design Principles

🀝 Human-guided AI

AI should support creative decision-making, not replace it.

πŸ”„ Design for iteration

Creative work is nonlinear, and the system should support exploration without penalty.

πŸ‘οΈ Make trust visible

Users need clarity around how images are generated, reviewed, and approved.

πŸ—οΈ Scale through structure

Clear workflows and guardrails enable speed rather than slow it down.

Research & Discovery

I partnered closely with internal teams to understand how AI experimentation fit into existing creative workflows and where hesitation emerged.

Key insights included:

  • Teams were open to using AI, but lacked confidence in the process

  • Unclear expectations made approval and review feel risky

  • Iteration was happening, but not in a way that was visible or reusable

This reframed the work from introducing AI tooling to designing a workflow that made AI usage reliable and repeatable.

The Solution

1. A structured image lifecycle

The system supports a clear progression from prompt creation to image generation, review, refinement, and approval.

This replaced ad-hoc experimentation with a workflow teams could rely on and repeat.

  • The workflow requires users to enter key fields, including zone and/or category IDs, ensuring assets are correctly associated with Beehive, the Roku Channel’s centralized tool for storing and retrieving titles and images.

  • These images are generated and managed through a series of APIs and processes, primarily involving the Beehive backend.

3. Designed for Iteration

Teams could explore multiple variations, compare outputs, and refine their work without starting over.

This made experimentation intentional rather than disposable.

4. Cross-team alignment

By making expectations explicit, the system created shared understanding between creators, reviewers, and stakeholders.

This alignment was essential for scaling AI-generated imagery beyond early adopters.

2. Guardrails that support creativity

The platform makes approval states explicit by surfacing clear status indicators for generated images, including approved, rejected, and unrejected states. This allows teams to experiment freely while maintaining shared understanding around quality, ownership, and readiness to ship.

Impact

While the platform continued to evolve, early outcomes included:

  • Increased confidence in using AI-generated assets

  • Reduced friction between creation and approval

  • Clearer ownership and accountability

  • A foundation for scaling AI-assisted creativity responsibly

  • Significant engagement increased for All Things Home, stream rate +20.04%, DSD (Direct Stream Digital) +15.75%, SH (Streaming Hours) +21.25%, and visits +28.49%

  • The Browse Row on the Homepage, where these lifestyle destinations are featured, also show significant performance improvements as well. Browse Row DSD +8.30%, Unique Viewer Rate +10.50%, and Account Click Rate +8.49%

What’s next?

With more time, I would focus on:

  • Adding measurement to understand iteration patterns and quality outcomes

  • Evolving governance as AI capabilities and usage grow

  • Exploring deeper integrations with upstream creative tools

Previous
Previous

ScreenBuilder Redesign

Next
Next

FRAME